For Wellington’s traffic cone; Gresley’s rubber duck – an avoidable embarrassment for Camden

Please spread the word

SP-Statue-wall-front-viewCamden Council granted planning permission for the statue of Sir Nigel Gresley and Mallard in November 2014, with the words “the works hereby approved are only those specifically indicated on the drawing(s) referred to above”. The ‘drawings‘, of course, and all the supporting documentation (such as the computer-generated picture shown here) clearly indicated a mallard duck at Gresley’s feet. This was the design the Gresley Society trustees had approved, and the one submitted to public consultation through the planning process.

And yet, now that the trustees have had their minds changed and have changed the design of the statue by asking the sculptor to remove the mallard, Camden Council apparently do not intend to insist the installation goes ahead as per the permission, ie with the mallard.  This is despite overwhelming public support for inclusion of the mallard, and as we understand it, in breach of planning law.

duke_of_wellington_traffic_cone_glasgow

It remains to be seen whether protesters will pursue this latest point and call for judicial review of Camden’s decision, but one thing does seem certain: there will be ducks on the statue. So many people have told us about plans for their own ducky tributes to Sir Nigel at King’s Cross that Camden looks set to have its own version of Glasgow’s Duke of Wellington statue, forever sporting a traffic cone.

plastic duckCamden could avoid this potential embarrassment now: by making it clear to the Gresley Society Trust that the statue must be installed lawfully, with the (bronze) mallard.

 

One thought on “For Wellington’s traffic cone; Gresley’s rubber duck – an avoidable embarrassment for Camden

  1. “We want the Duck”. It seems incredible that the great man’s own family do not appear to grasp the signifcance of having “The Duck” beside him.
    Did they not stop to consider the number of his class A4’s that were named after birds….and of course the proposed “Duck” for the statue bears a strong resemblence to a “Mallard”, arguably his greatest legacy. How anyone can possibly see this as “demeaning” is beyond me, and by the comments made, beyond many others as well.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *